forums.rs

Forums

+ The Coalition of World 31 + Thread is locked

Quick find code: 90-91-292-63466585

of 95
Rose 2110

Rose 2110

Posts: 2,634 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I kinda agree with Roi, Ozz no offense to you.



------------------


This document states the agreement on the new system for world 31, those who sign it may remove their name anytime before the document is enacted.

-The new thread shall only be used for land claims and wars; no discussions will be allowed on it
-the bare basics of rules shall be used, new ones being added if and when situation arises
-land-claiming shall be done the old ways, of eliminating npcs in local area
-revolutions shall not be recognized until they take their own clan identity and must war/challenge the mother clan to receive any land from it(unless given by mother clan)
-specific means of warring for land shall be named, so, as a clan on one side of the world will not be able to war for a random patch of dirt on another, specifics shall be discussed and then clarified on new thread
-clan-related businesses on world-31 are recognized by this system
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Guardians of Realm(maloy10)-Yes
Empire of Zaros(Novem)-Yes
Morello (Rio Armani)-Yes
Bloodlines (The Five Squads) - Yes
Rudek (Arber162)- Yes
Royal Empire ( Rose 2110 +4 ) - Yes

21-Mar-2012 10:04:03 - Last edited on 21-Mar-2012 10:04:17 by Rose 2110

Jonathann226

Jonathann226

Posts: 678 Steel Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
This document states the agreement on the new system for world 31, those who sign it may remove their name anytime before the document is enacted.

-The new thread shall only be used for land claims and wars; no discussions will be allowed on it
-the bare basics of rules shall be used, new ones being added if and when situation arises
-land-claiming shall be done the old ways, of eliminating npcs in local area
-revolutions shall not be recognized until they take their own clan identity and must war/challenge the mother clan to receive any land from it(unless given by mother clan)
-specific means of warring for land shall be named, so, as a clan on one side of the world will not be able to war for a random patch of dirt on another, specifics shall be discussed and then clarified on new thread
-clan-related businesses on world-31 are recognized by this system
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Guardians of Realm(maloy10)-Yes
Empire of Zaros(Novem)-Yes
Morello (Rio Armani)-Yes
Bloodlines (The Five Squads) - Yes
Rudek (Arber162)- Yes
Royal Empire ( Rose 2110 +4 ) - Yes
The White Knights of World 31 (Jonathann226)

____________________

Nothing against you personally Ozz, but you don't have what it takes to be threadholder. You aren't active enough. Its always such a hassle for us to get you to update anything.

I also think before we make anything official, we need to add to rule 2. When new rules are needed, who decideds, and how? I think it should be a 90-95% majority for any new rule.

We should also add a basic standard set up rules for clan wars. Ie. one set map, killcount, all potions/magic/summoning/food and yes allies. If 2 warring clans can't agree on rules for war, they use the default one, no clans can force other clan to accept their rules.

But really, I think we should keep rules to a minimum. The only rules we need are basic clan wars rules and claiming process rules.

21-Mar-2012 18:39:30

Maloy10

Maloy10

Posts: 5,661 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Since the new system will require in-game activity on world 31(to claim land and maintain) most RSB clans won't be able to maintain presence here so, I see no issue with them.


On warring. I say let anything go, rules need to be clearly defined before the war, that includes what kind, and thats it, otherwise let people be as creative as they want with it lol.

21-Mar-2012 20:23:56

Hank Hill I

Hank Hill I

Posts: 10,174 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
RSB Manipulation, in Roi's case during the BL v. EoZ war (which lasted approx 3.5 months, if you recall) has led both my stance, along with Roi's stance, to be anti-RSB clans joining the league. This is a POC-league, NOT A RUNESCAPE BATTLE LADDER LEAGUE. They don't exist like us, they fight competitive ladders.

To say it'd even be 1% fair to have them in here isn't even close to accurate. RSB and RSC are two ENTIRELY DIFFERENT COMMUNITIES.

I stand in undeniable and total opposition to RSB-Clan entrance into a POC-League.

21-Mar-2012 20:32:30

Maloy10

Maloy10

Posts: 5,661 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
On Abilities to War For Land: I want to post how I think we should define them, its just ideas, and I would really like for other people to contribute to it.

-You can not attack land that is not adjacent to land you or an ally owns(and if it is an ally you have to be in someway connected to their land)
-You can attack lands next to the Ocean IF you own a port
-If you own Barbarian Village wherever the river canoes can take you you are able to attack
-Those who own tree gnome stronghold may attack anywhere the gliders lead
-Those who own tree gnome village can attack where the teleporting trees access
-House portals are officially neutral grounds, although clans are free to fight in them and for influence over
-Pollinveach is center of the Desert carpet rides, owner may attack wherever they lead
-battlefield is split into two sides


any other ideas or criticism feel free to contribute lol, I think adding these shortcuts will provide both realism to the warring make it interesting, making certain plots of lands more desirable either for self-defense or for a war path

21-Mar-2012 20:43:18

Maloy10

Maloy10

Posts: 5,661 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
RSB Manipulation, in Roi's case during the BL v. EoZ war (which lasted approx 3.5 months, if you recall) has led both my stance, along with Roi's stance, to be anti-RSB clans joining the league. This is a POC-league, NOT A RUNESCAPE BATTLE LADDER LEAGUE. They don't exist like us, they fight competitive ladders.

To say it'd even be 1% fair to have them in here isn't even close to accurate. RSB and RSC are two ENTIRELY DIFFERENT COMMUNITIES.

I stand in undeniable and total opposition to RSB-Clan entrance into a POC-League.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Well, completely cutting them off is a tone of segregation

Also since the new system requires in-game activity I wouldn't see it as necesarry as they could never maintain a long-term stance here, especially not over large amounts of land.

21-Mar-2012 20:44:55

SF Roi

SF Roi

Posts: 5,754 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Well we're being civil about most of this, why not put to vote the situation of RSB-ladder clans?

We shall both make claims and counter-claims regarding RSB-rights (so to speak).

Then we should have the right to vote on it after considering both sides.

21-Mar-2012 21:38:23

Quick find code: 90-91-292-63466585 Back to Top