-The past so far.
-Anarchy gives rise to something; you're asking for someone like Roi or I to take over by military feats in the pool of anarchy, and with it, chaos.
-It wouldn't be ruling, it would simply represent the policies of the world to disable people bypassing the rules/claims that we all want.
-I wouldn't worry about needing people to join the League, I have a plan to cover that.
-The only corruption would be each clan corrupting themselves with 1 representative that can easily be replaced.
-Which is why I asked for a balanced rule, which doesn't actually apply to either side, therefore making warring more "powerful" on this world, as it used to be. Simple structure of law/order would be nice, though.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-That is a lot of past
-No power ever stayed in power for long, and maintaining control over that much land for a long period of time never really worked on old 31
-You don't need to be an enforcer hank, system will have a thread and referees.
-Please enlighten us on this plan
-Your past remarks on the thread have argued that our past systems have been corrupt, your suggesting a system very very similar, what is the difference?
-So, the general idea on rule-making is hoping everyone is fair and balanced? Also, we are wanting a simple rule structure
Also, why is your system superior?
20-Mar-2012 22:00:05