You're right, really. I have a bit of a skewed view of guilds because I went through the ranks so fast, and undeservedly at that—I think that the first day I posted my story I hit Gold in The Golden Pen, and by the end of that summer I was in TAL, TIGA, and about three others whose names I don't even remember. Honestly the top ranked stories then are equivalent to what today I view as 'acceptable' or 'having potential.'
I think there's a place for honest judgment, is what I'm trying to get at, I think. I agree with all your points, I'm just trying to figure out where my own views fit in. Because tiered guilds do indeed let you showcase your progress, and the feeling of advancing is wonderful, it makes you want to strive. Once you reach the top there isn't really the same impetus. But at the same time, it also helps to have an upper bound as well as a lower one, someone like Wolfeh that is the Supreme Arbiter of Goodness who you so desperately want to impress. Now, I'm not saying that he was
justified
in being that, because like I said, ranks were inflated, a long time ago. But theoretically, having that top tier is nice, because it's also something to work toward, and—again, theoretically—if that person is really judging truthfully, you know that when you've reached that tier you've started to create something really worthwhile.
I came to not like the guild system as a whole, in the end, though I do miss it—there are some guilds that focus on getting better, on community activity, but ranking was and is always the core of it, medals to pin on your chest to show off. Which is why I restarted the Academy in the summer, though of course that didn't last long.
Anyhow. I don't know what I believe, is the core of it. I love teaching people to get better, and I know that I, personally, have to be absolutely honest about how good someone is if they ask. But there are many ways to go about it, and I don't know that they, at least, can be ranked.
19-Dec-2013 19:10:49