Forums

||...Agony...||

Quick find code: 49-50-307-57974397

Yrolg

Yrolg

Posts: 25,296 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
“Natalie pointed to the roseate sky.”
Now, as a connoisseur of advanced lexicons, I must beseech that you rescind usage of these verbosities when not appropriate.
There is a time and place for everything. If you wish to use advanced lexicon, I really applaud you for this, but please make sure that you are using it in the right way. This is a fairly simple sentence, and is really awkward when, out of the blue, you provide a non-simple word. Create a situation in which advanced vocabulary will benefit you instead of subtracting from your piece’s value.
I also find it ironic that roseate can also mean optimistic. =)

“She didn't to be told what it was about. “
You are missing a predicate in this sentence.

“as if she was a powered-down robot.”
Please remember to keep setting in mind when describing. This is set in RuneScape, which is a game whose time-period is roughly the middle-ages. There were no robots in this time-period. Using a robot as a method of description simply takes away from the world you are creating. You want the reader to be able to escape the real world and enter your world, but when you bring things from the real world into play, it takes away from the bubble-experience.

13-Apr-2009 17:45:56 - Last edited on 13-Apr-2009 17:46:19 by Yrolg

Yrolg

Yrolg

Posts: 25,296 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
“(c)"Th-the Wilderness!?"”
Please don’t use the (c) or <censor> in this story. I realize that you want your message to get across, but firstly, it is against the rules (though I doubt any moderator is petty enough to remotely care =P), and secondly it, similar to the above quote, hurts the overall experience.

“There used to be two trees at a time long ago, another at the south, however a careless adventurer had hacked one of them for firewood long ago. She could also see the trapdoor through the decrepit structure, that lead down into Edgeville'* dungeon. “
Allow for me to identify errors in this paragraph.
*Used to be”
Don’t use this phrase, as it is oftentimes incorrectly used. *Used to” is a phrase which is used to indicate a former practice. Being isn’t a practice, I’m afraid. ;)
“at a time long ago”
This is prolixious and rather vague. Why is this phrase necessary at all? *used to” already shows that this was in the past.
“however”
This word is very often misused. As a caution, I will state that you should never begin a sentence with “however” unless it is being used as “in whatever way” or “to whatever extent”. When used as it is most commonly seen as “nevertheless”, you should never begin a sentence with it. Additionally, replacing this word with its definition in the above quoted paragraph doesn’t make sense;
“There used to be two trees at a time long ago, another at the south, nevertheless a careless adventurer…”
Lastly, the comma before “that” isn’t necessary. “That lead down into Edgeville** dungeon” doesn’t comply with any phrase requisite of a comma.

13-Apr-2009 17:46:07

Yrolg

Yrolg

Posts: 25,296 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
“courage to even set one foot into the grievous dungeon. “
Please trust me when I say that you should never split an infinitive unless absolutely necessary. Many authors and editors keep the practice of not ever allowing a person to ever split (=P!) an infinitive. I say that it is alright as long as you’re willing to prove to me that it won’t work any other way.
In case you don’t know, an infinite is the basic verb form. To walk, to pray, to split, to set are all infinitives. Splitting it refers to placing anything between the “to” and the verb. A famous case is Star Trek’s “To boldly go”.
“"Hiiiiiii Veronica!" chirped the girl in variegated clothing”
“Hiiiiiii” is just obnoxious to me. “Hi” is perfectly fine, if all the girl is doing is chirping. Chirps are short squeeks, not long, drawn out calls. Were the girl to be drawing out the call, it should still be represented only by “Hiii Veronica!” the girl drawled.”

““"Omigosh! What's wrong with Veronica!?"”
Firstly, there are too many quotation marks before “Omigosh”. Secondly, “Omigosh* isn’t a word, and should not ever be used.
“Is that why we're you needed us Robert!?" “
There is an error: “we’re” isn’t needed.

“She replied courtly and with no visible expression at all.”
I believe that you mean “curtly”.

“The still bleeding girl just smiled and agreed.**
I don’t understand why there is a quotation mark after “agreed”.
“"Lalala~" sang the girl sitting above Robert.”
I do not understand why you included a tilde.
“Georgia got up, reacting to the situation any displays of panic, as Robert had.”
This sentence is… very vague and grammatically incorrect. I do not understand the inclosure of *any displays of panic”.

13-Apr-2009 17:46:36

Yrolg

Yrolg

Posts: 25,296 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
“and within was it contained.”
Within was contained… what? What did the church contain?

“and certiantly the only kind to be able to unlock the entrance to Edgeville dungeon.”
I believe that you mean “certainly”.

“Without word nor hesitance, she bolted through the gate, leaving Robert and Edward no choice but to follow their light source. “
Nor is a very often misused and misunderstood word. It has several grammatically correct uses which should be evaded. While the negative form of the word “or”, it should not be thrown into just any negative phrase. Some prefer that it is used only with the word “neither” as in
Neither Susan nor Robbie wanted to read the story,
but I prefer that it is used only when it fits correctly into the flow. I allow for it to be used with the word “not* as well.
Without, however, does not allow for usage of “nor*.

*Georgia ceased her violent attack on the door to address him.”
Is it a door or is it a gate?
“candle only igniting the area so much”
To ignite is to set on fire. I believe that a better word choice would be “illuminating”.

“And gasped fearfully.”
I don’t mind having a few sentences start with a conjunction, as I stated above, but I do mind, however, is this sentence: it doesn’t make sense whatsoever on its own. Who gasped? I can assume that it was Georgia, but this requires time away from the story thinking: wasted time that a reader won’* want to spend. Why is it the beginning of a new paragraph? The first sentence in a paragraph should be the topic sentence. Firstly, this isn’t a sentence, and secondly, this doesn’t have a topic. =|

“an contest of archery, Robert would stand no chance. “
I believe you know the rules concerning the usage of “an” over “a”. Directly before a vowel only.

13-Apr-2009 17:46:51

Yrolg

Yrolg

Posts: 25,296 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
“with two pathways one north, one south. “
Here is a prime example of where complex punctuation should be used, but isn’t. A colon should be included before “one north”, and the comma should be removed after this, and, in its place, the word “and” included.
“dived to the ground and were up again in a flash”
Instead of “dived”, I would use “dove”. This is a situation similar to “quit” versus “quitted”; it simply sounds better to use “dove”.
“They'd escaped, alive.”
Replace this with either
“They’d escaped…alive”
or
“They’d escaped. Alive.”

“if it was really him he saw.”
I believe that you mean “she saw”.
“leaving them be as they did them.”
Pronouns only go so far, my friend. This is utterly confusing. Replace one (OR MORE) of these pronouns, please!
“leaving the beasts alone just as the beasts did the group.”
“"Definately,"”
I believe that you mean “definitely”.
“Georgia came away from the shelves with nought but a few rusted tools and rotten food products. “
I believe that you mean naught.

“Robert did so and the door opened without fascination. “
I fail to see the relevance of “without fascination”. If the door opened and nothing special happened, the reader can figure this out when you abstain from stating that anything happened. You don’t need to explicitly write out that nothing happened unless this is utterly relevant.

“What-what in Saradromin's name...?”
I believe that you mean “Saradomin’s name”.
“once Edward and Tristan's house”
This means that the house was once the actual person Edward, and belonged to Tristan… Tristan owned Edward, who turned into a house. O_o
When showing possession, you need to include the ‘s after each article:
“once Edward’s and Tristan’s house.*

13-Apr-2009 17:47:16

Yrolg

Yrolg

Posts: 25,296 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
“"It looks so pitiful..." thought Jaden,”
Be consistent, please. You earlier showed thoughts by a single apostrophe on each side of the thought. Do so here, as well.
“Jaden roared with irritation and shoved Georgia off of him, ignoring the girl's interrogation and set about pulling her hair as hard as he could. The two rolled around the blemished ground, soaking themselves in the gore around them as they fought, Jaden in infuriation and Georgia because she felt like it. “
This is random, unprecedented, and without instigation. To me it felt a bit unreal. I would suggest scaling back the exaggeration.
“While the kids and their family's had been severely underfunded,”
There need be no apostrophe in “family’s”.

“Robert had planned on waking her,”
I would instead say
“Robert had planned to wake her”.

13-Apr-2009 17:47:30

Yrolg

Yrolg

Posts: 25,296 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
The following is your rubric for “Agony”.
Literary Tools: 107/150
--Description: 25/40
--Voice: 20/25
--Symbolism: 10/25
--Depth: 15/20
--Analysis: 10/20
--Word Choice: 17/20
--Juxtaposition: 5/10

Structure: 90/120
--Format: 30/40
--Grammar: 25/30
--Usage: 15/20
--Sentence Configuration: 10/15
--Basics: 10/15
Plot: 74/100
--Development: 30/40
--Intricacy: 27/30
--Consistency: 10/15
--Originality: 7/15
Other: 44/90
--Impact: 15/20
--Flow: 15/20
--Conclusion: 0/15
--Theme: 10/15
--Empathetic Ties: 7/10
--Title Relevance: 7/10
Layout: 65/80
--Introduction: 25/30
--Overall Appearance: 16/20
--Title Page: 12/15
--Chapter Configuration: 12/15

Total: 380/520, 73%.
You and I differed only by five points in this rubric. Please note, however, that you scored yourself a zero for “Conclusion”. I scored you a twelve in this category. If I award you a nine, which, when averaged out, you would have scored yourself, we differ by fourteen points, which is still relatively close.
I am pleased that you are aware of your abilities and your faults.

13-Apr-2009 17:47:44

Yrolg

Yrolg

Posts: 25,296 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
The following is my rubric for “Agony”.
Literary Tools: 111/150, 74%.
--Description: 32/40
--Voice: 14/25
--Symbolism: 10/25
--Depth: 17/20
--Analysis: 16/20
--Word Choice: 14/20
--Juxtaposition: 8/10

Structure: 62/120, 51.6%
--Format: 31/40
--Grammar: 10/30
--Usage: 8/20
--Sentence Configuration: 5/15
--Basics: 8/15
Plot: 80/100, 80%
--Development: 35/40
--Intricacy: 23/30
--Consistency:13 /15
--Originality: 9/15
Other: 58/90, 64.4%
--Impact: 12/20
--Flow: 10/20
--Conclusion: 12/15
--Theme: 11/15
--Empathetic Ties: 6/10
--Title Relevance: 7/10
Layout: 64/80, 80%
--Introduction: 24/30
--Overall Appearance: 16/20
--Title Page: 14/15
--Chapter Configuration: 10/15

Total: 375/520, 72.1%

Your lowest score by far was “Structure”. This is, for the most part, because of your sentences. Had I been ignorant of some aspects of your introduction, I would have scored you significantly lower in your “Format” sub-section, and this would have drastically altered your score. The reason that you scored so low in this section is because you try to incorporate far too much information into a single sentence. This leaves you with too little information for the following sentence, hence why you simply begin it with a conjunction, having no new information for a primary clause.
A pattern I noticed is that you incorporate three ideas into one sentence and then one into the next. If you could somehow average this out, maintaining two or fewer ideas per sentence, it would make it much easier for you to convey your ideas. Another tool which would help you in shortening your run-on sentences is complex punctuation: extended hyphens, semicolons, and colons. These really help with sentence configuration, and, if used, would force you to begin the process of restructuring your pieces. I could not find but four semicolons in your entire piece. I have more than this in my introduction to “Lunar Eclipse” alone.

13-Apr-2009 17:48:00

Yrolg

Yrolg

Posts: 25,296 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Another fact that I noticed was that your paragraph isn’t necessary all there. It seems that you arbitrarily choose when to begin a new paragraph. The following is a quote from “The Elements of Style”, and I think it will help you to understand just what a paragraph is.
“Make the paragraph the unit of composition: one paragraph to each topic.
“If the subject on which you are writing is of slight extent, or if you intend to treat it very briefly, there may be no need of subdividing it into topics. Thus a brief description… a narrative merely outlining an action, the setting forth of a single idea, any one of these is best written in a single paragraph.”
If you began to write having only one main idea to each paragraph, I think that this too should aid in your restructuring of sentences.
Additionally, I noticed a significant lack of depth in your piece. There were no discernible symbols, no allusions, and there was very limited irony. Additionally, your word choice on a select few occasions really forced the reader to stop and rethink what you were trying to tell him. This caused a drop in your impact, hence the lower score.
I also noticed that you tend to describe a bit too much. This is partly responsible for your sentence problems. Whilst description is a wonderful tool, it should be used intelligently. If your characters are walking down a hallway, it makes absolutely no sense to go into excessive detail over a particular doorway that they walk past unless the doorway will later be relevant – perhaps a tool for a quick escape. I noticed that when you describe, you oftentimes forget the relevance of certain items and the utter irrelevance of others.

13-Apr-2009 17:48:24

Infinity A8

Infinity A8

Posts: 10,192 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Thank you very much for your extremely detailed review! No doubt it'll help me immensely with the remainder of this story and those yet to come.
Regarding your last paragraph (on your thread, you've left it out here) while it may not appear so now, the story will become more horror orientated in later chapters.
I have no other comments or complaints, you've done a fantastic and thorough job, one that was well worth the wait. ^_^

14-Apr-2009 00:06:48 - Last edited on 17-Apr-2009 13:09:43 by Infinity A8

Quick find code: 49-50-307-57974397 Back to Top