The following is my rubric for “Agony”.
Literary Tools: 111/150, 74%.
--Description: 32/40
--Voice: 14/25
--Symbolism: 10/25
--Depth: 17/20
--Analysis: 16/20
--Word Choice: 14/20
--Juxtaposition: 8/10
Structure: 62/120, 51.6%
--Format: 31/40
--Grammar: 10/30
--Usage: 8/20
--Sentence Configuration: 5/15
--Basics: 8/15
Plot: 80/100, 80%
--Development: 35/40
--Intricacy: 23/30
--Consistency:13 /15
--Originality: 9/15
Other: 58/90, 64.4%
--Impact: 12/20
--Flow: 10/20
--Conclusion: 12/15
--Theme: 11/15
--Empathetic Ties: 6/10
--Title Relevance: 7/10
Layout: 64/80, 80%
--Introduction: 24/30
--Overall Appearance: 16/20
--Title Page: 14/15
--Chapter Configuration: 10/15
Total: 375/520, 72.1%
Your lowest score by far was “Structure”. This is, for the most part, because of your sentences. Had I been ignorant of some aspects of your introduction, I would have scored you significantly lower in your “Format” sub-section, and this would have drastically altered your score. The reason that you scored so low in this section is because you try to incorporate far too much information into a single sentence. This leaves you with too little information for the following sentence, hence why you simply begin it with a conjunction, having no new information for a primary clause.
A pattern I noticed is that you incorporate three ideas into one sentence and then one into the next. If you could somehow average this out, maintaining two or fewer ideas per sentence, it would make it much easier for you to convey your ideas. Another tool which would help you in shortening your run-on sentences is complex punctuation: extended hyphens, semicolons, and colons. These really help with sentence configuration, and, if used, would force you to begin the process of restructuring your pieces. I could not find but four semicolons in your entire piece. I have more than this in my introduction to “Lunar Eclipse” alone.
13-Apr-2009 17:48:00