Forums
A chance is what I'm asking
Quick find code: 408-409-961-66274711
The problem is, that j-mods does mistakes also, when making a decision and not taking all of the things in consideration, the bigger problem is that a player can't appeal again a denied appeal even though I know for a fact that I didn't do anything wrong.
15-Feb-2023 21:59:31
When a ban appeal is checked, the account is being checked for the
third
time. The second check is to pick up any possible mistakes the first checking JMod might have made. The third check is to pick up any possible mistakes made by the first two JMods.
Yes, JMods make mistakes but, after the third check, they are pretty confident that they have made the correct decision.
One thing they are really looking for in a macroing ban appeal is evidence of hijacker activity on the account at the time of the offence. If the appeal is denied, it means there is no evidence of hijacker activity.
No evidence of hijacker activity doesn't necessarily mean there was no hijacker activity, it just means hijacker activity couldn't be found.
This could mean that your account was being used by someone close by...a friend or housemate.
JMods aren't infallible but the account being used by someone close by makes it impossible for them to assume that you weren't involved. You might have let someone use your account while you were away.
Original message details are unavailable.
The problem is, that j-mods does mistakes also, when making a decision and not taking all of the things in consideration, "Taking all things into consideration" is a phrase which sounds like it should be important in a ban appeal. However it is impossible to judge "Taking all things into consideration" .
JMods judge on the digital record of account activity i.e. hard facts of what happened.
Yes, JMods make mistakes but, after the third check, they are pretty confident that they have made the correct decision.
One thing they are really looking for in a macroing ban appeal is evidence of hijacker activity on the account at the time of the offence. If the appeal is denied, it means there is no evidence of hijacker activity.
No evidence of hijacker activity doesn't necessarily mean there was no hijacker activity, it just means hijacker activity couldn't be found.
This could mean that your account was being used by someone close by...a friend or housemate.
JMods aren't infallible but the account being used by someone close by makes it impossible for them to assume that you weren't involved. You might have let someone use your account while you were away.
Original message details are unavailable.
The problem is, that j-mods does mistakes also, when making a decision and not taking all of the things in consideration, "Taking all things into consideration" is a phrase which sounds like it should be important in a ban appeal. However it is impossible to judge "Taking all things into consideration" .
JMods judge on the digital record of account activity i.e. hard facts of what happened.
Forum Community Helper -
Information about Moderators and Community Helpers
15-Feb-2023 23:58:59 - Last edited on 16-Feb-2023 00:17:23 by Malua
Quick find code: 408-409-961-66274711 Back to Top