Forums
Tier Rebalancing: Next Steps
Quick find code: 380-381-778-66240084
This update does make a lot of sense, though I can’t stress enough about how option two is so much better off and an even playing field for players in my opinion.
All of the weapons being effected are not really used by pures in the wilderness so a lot of them will be ok, although my account for example is built for pking but also I do enjoy doing pvm, I like doing pvm on a pure as it’s more of a unique challenge when limiting to certain items and being more dependant on prayer flicks. I’m in a clan which we all have limited 75 attack builds and they also have a high boss logs.
I feel asides from that this will further more divide the pvp and pvm community because if nobody wants to budge their attack from 75 they will most likely stick to pvp or just play mains. It’s great that you’ve outlined option one and two so you understand how much this can jeopardize pures, I think what’s most disappointing about the change would be that it takes so long to grind stats and carve an account to exactly how we want it given the equipment requirements at the time to then be changed after a crazy amount of hours work.
75 attack and 99 strength is the way to go! There’s not enough reward when finally reaching a 99 other than a fancy skillcape anyways and since 97-99 has the same max hit why not reward players who grind all the way to the end (99 str) with a new equipment unlock.
I mean look at the scythe, it takes two hands to hold and stands double the height of the character, that tells me that is heavy and needs the muscle to weild
. Just kidding but yeah. That’s my thoughts
Option 2!!!!
Plz
All of the weapons being effected are not really used by pures in the wilderness so a lot of them will be ok, although my account for example is built for pking but also I do enjoy doing pvm, I like doing pvm on a pure as it’s more of a unique challenge when limiting to certain items and being more dependant on prayer flicks. I’m in a clan which we all have limited 75 attack builds and they also have a high boss logs.
I feel asides from that this will further more divide the pvp and pvm community because if nobody wants to budge their attack from 75 they will most likely stick to pvp or just play mains. It’s great that you’ve outlined option one and two so you understand how much this can jeopardize pures, I think what’s most disappointing about the change would be that it takes so long to grind stats and carve an account to exactly how we want it given the equipment requirements at the time to then be changed after a crazy amount of hours work.
75 attack and 99 strength is the way to go! There’s not enough reward when finally reaching a 99 other than a fancy skillcape anyways and since 97-99 has the same max hit why not reward players who grind all the way to the end (99 str) with a new equipment unlock.
I mean look at the scythe, it takes two hands to hold and stands double the height of the character, that tells me that is heavy and needs the muscle to weild
. Just kidding but yeah. That’s my thoughts
Option 2!!!!
Plz
21-Dec-2021 18:10:53
Main thing which bugs me about the rebalance is the lance change, I feel it should be 75 not 78 but ngl this is mainly for my benefits as my stats are 75 92 99 (57m exp in def) but I will just have to deal whit that if it happens
My own account aside, imo having to grind a skill to 99 just to use a tire 80 atk weapon just seems a bit obsered. Whit some questionable quick maths 99 str and 75 atk would be the equivalent to about 93 in both atk and str which is a long grind for a tire 80. Now i'm not saying make them 80 atk weapons as you for well know you would lose a lot of money from people who play pures as well as damage the all ready dwindling pvp humans. What I do feel would be a better option would be to do some thing more on the lines of 75 atk 80 str for blade, rapier and mace but still keep the Scyth at the proposed 85/85. reasoning for scythe simply put its just better then the other 3 weapon if it really has to be a 75 atk weapon then make it 75/88.
personally i like option 1 better (80atks) however it will do more harm then good for the game. I'm really not the biggest fan of duel locked requirements simple because its forces people to make accounts in a particular way.
hope this makes sense sorry for the most likely poor sentence structure and grammar :S
My own account aside, imo having to grind a skill to 99 just to use a tire 80 atk weapon just seems a bit obsered. Whit some questionable quick maths 99 str and 75 atk would be the equivalent to about 93 in both atk and str which is a long grind for a tire 80. Now i'm not saying make them 80 atk weapons as you for well know you would lose a lot of money from people who play pures as well as damage the all ready dwindling pvp humans. What I do feel would be a better option would be to do some thing more on the lines of 75 atk 80 str for blade, rapier and mace but still keep the Scyth at the proposed 85/85. reasoning for scythe simply put its just better then the other 3 weapon if it really has to be a 75 atk weapon then make it 75/88.
personally i like option 1 better (80atks) however it will do more harm then good for the game. I'm really not the biggest fan of duel locked requirements simple because its forces people to make accounts in a particular way.
hope this makes sense sorry for the most likely poor sentence structure and grammar :S
22-Dec-2021 14:38:23
Option #1 please! I've been saving up for a ghrazi rapier and I don't have 99 strength
If option 2 were implemented it would harm normal non-pvp players like me who don't have 99 strength
If option 2 were implemented it would harm normal non-pvp players like me who don't have 99 strength
22-Dec-2021 17:12:07
Quick find code: 380-381-778-66240084 Back to Top