forums.rs

Forums

Dev Blog: PvP & POH Rooms

Quick find code: 380-381-300-65803604

of 26
Angel2D4

Angel2D4

Posts: 15,772 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Sharbati said :
Angel2D4 said :
"Question: Should the dragon defender be visually updated to remove its pink glow?"

-

A month ago (a MONTH!) the community told you NO. It was a resounding NO. It didn't even hit 70 percent support and you've changed NOTHING about the question, so why repeat it a mere month later?

That's rhetorical as clearly the reason you'd repeat it is you want it changed even if the players don't.

yo stop crying kid dragon defender looks pink obv ,its dragon not pink defender :S

yo stop crying kid it didn't pass the poll a month ago so obv the community said NO "Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity" -Martin Luther King Jr.

18-Jun-2016 03:21:07

Emo Bee

Emo Bee

Posts: 361 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
65 construction is far too low for the pool of revitalization. 65 is very easy to get and that pool is astonishingly powerful. Please make it at least 85+ (requiring at least 2m total con xp).

Actually, you can get a + 8 boost for construction. Please make the pool require 93 construction. It needs to be reasonably high.

18-Jun-2016 03:53:55 - Last edited on 18-Jun-2016 03:55:48 by Emo Bee

Ownage Omg

Ownage Omg

Posts: 14,364 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I really hope all of this passes, especially the untradeables on death thing but unfortunately I don't see that particular question passing. :/

I agree with everyone saying pool revitalisation should be WAY higher than 65 construction.
Hardstyle
|
@OwnageRS
|
OSRS
|
U
K

18-Jun-2016 04:01:21 - Last edited on 18-Jun-2016 04:01:54 by Ownage Omg

Yung SE

Yung SE

Posts: 124 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Really awesome poll but a lot of the construction reqs are way too low, especially the pool which should be 95+ in my opinion. Give pkers an incentive to let a skiller join their crew! Also the zenyte ring would be way too op; it would have to be recharged or something. If you do the math on it, it would end up being way better than all the other rings combined by far. Against the armadyl boss for example it might give you an extra 10-15 damage per kill, whereas an archers ring wouldnt help you anywhere near that much.

18-Jun-2016 04:33:35

Killary
Jan Member 2014

Killary

Posts: 59 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
"On another note, I made space for these 2 rooms in mouse house in anticipation for this update... right on the 2nd floor. :| Was not expecting one of them to be a garden lol."

These rooms were detailed at RuneFest 2015. Available on YouTube.

18-Jun-2016 04:55:06 - Last edited on 18-Jun-2016 04:55:45 by Killary

Sugarfiend
Dec Member 2011

Sugarfiend

Posts: 468 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I would be worried if there is an amount of the golden glories spawned, it may take some of the price of regular amulets (this may be counter-acted by people trying to get the golden glory but this may be short lived.).
Perhaps adding that after a LARGE amount of uses, it must be recharged (e.g. over 1k teles, some gp is needed to refill.
The perhaps of this GP is not to make it a super large amount, but just enough so the new glory doesn't make the original, completely obsolete.

18-Jun-2016 05:26:07

Emo Bee

Emo Bee

Posts: 361 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Sugarfiend said :
I would be worried if there is an amount of the golden glories spawned, it may take some of the price of regular amulets (this may be counter-acted by people trying to get the golden glory but this may be short lived.).
Perhaps adding that after a LARGE amount of uses, it must be recharged (e.g. over 1k teles, some gp is needed to refill.
The perhaps of this GP is not to make it a super large amount, but just enough so the new glory doesn't make the original, completely obsolete.

It's 1/25,000 dude. It'll be a long time before one even exists. Then it'll encourage pkers to massacre people going to the fountain. Something so rare will never make the current glory obsolete, that's a silly idea. The golden one would be worth at least 10m from rarity alone. This is opposed to the current which costs 30k and is free to charge. Very few people will even consider buying an infinite glory worth more than 5m with those numbers. I think it's a good idea to have it ingame.

18-Jun-2016 05:29:57 - Last edited on 18-Jun-2016 05:31:28 by Emo Bee

Lucy HFilia

Lucy HFilia

Posts: 308 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Tbh, I have to agree, it rather does sound in direct contradiction to this quote from Ash on repolling things like this...
Original message details are unavailable.

Original message details are unavailable.

We offer a new Golden Sword of Awesomeness that one-hits everything.
You vote No because you correctly think it'd be over-powered.
In the end it gets 72%.

At this point, someone posts that the poll didn't pass because the sword was the wrong colour.

You're afraid that we'd believe them, and offer it again as the Turquoise Sword of Awesomeness that one-hits everything. And then, if that didn't pass, we try again with the Beige Sword of Awesomeness and the Puce Sword of Awesomeness until everyone quits except the players who want the sword.

Quite simply, we wouldn't do that. (Mod Ash)


I have to strongly disagree to that statement. They're not offering to poll a dragon defender that's going to deflect all attacks directed at the wielder, or anything like that. They're not changing anything about the combat aspects of the defender.

The initial poll was a cosmetic poll to begin with, so if people are saying they thought the cosmetic change pictures in the poll looked like something else to begin with, they want to make sure everyone is on the same page as to how the defender looks now , and how it's supposed to look after the cosmetic change. That way the poll accurately reflects how the community feels about the cosmetic change jagex is thinking of implementing. They always receive complaints about colors and stuff, anyway, so I don't think it's such a bad thing that they're doing their best to make sure everyone is on the same page for this cosmetic change.

18-Jun-2016 05:42:44

Quick find code: 380-381-300-65803604 Back to Top