As an Amascutian, Icthlarin's dialogue after Sliske's Endgame bothered me --
Original message details are unavailable.
My mother and father, Elidinis and Tumeken, lived among their followers, not above them. They wanted to be as they were. But there was one thing that, try as they might, they could never have. A family. At least, not what mortals would consider to be a family.
As I was told, they each took a piece of themselves, a spark of their divine power, and combined them into something new. Something formed of the both of them. They then placed this energy into the two beings most akin to their family. I was their pet dog. Not the most esteemed of beginnings, but it is not one I am shamed of. My sister, Amascut, began similar humble beginnings, as their beloved cat, though she has long fallen away from that person.
So when the labyrinth robbed me of my divine nature, I began to revert back to that simple creature.
This reduced Amascut and Ictharin to about the same level as Scabaras, Het, Apmeken, and Crondis, with the only difference being that Elidinis was involved in the creation of the former two but not involved in creation of the later four. Well, today while I was idly thinking about the Menaphos library (and what kind of heretical documents may be on its shelves), I remembered animalistic colossi like Loarnab, Araxxi, Seiryu, Thallassus, and Valluta were common during the First Age, at least in the theorizing Charos has done.
And I thought, what if Icthlarin was misremembering his own origin? Then I reread the dialog --
Original message details are unavailable.
As I was told, they each took a piece of themselves, a spark of their divine power...
Icthlarin doesn't remember his origin at all. He was told this story about his origin by Tumeken (and maybe Elidinis)
So what I wish to propose is:
Original message details are unavailable.
My mother and father, Elidinis and Tumeken, lived among their followers, not above them. They wanted to be as they were. But there was one thing that, try as they might, they could never have. A family. At least, not what mortals would consider to be a family.
As I was told, they each took a piece of themselves, a spark of their divine power, and combined them into something new. Something formed of the both of them. They then placed this energy into the two beings most akin to their family. I was their pet dog. Not the most esteemed of beginnings, but it is not one I am shamed of. My sister, Amascut, began similar humble beginnings, as their beloved cat, though she has long fallen away from that person.
So when the labyrinth robbed me of my divine nature, I began to revert back to that simple creature.
This reduced Amascut and Ictharin to about the same level as Scabaras, Het, Apmeken, and Crondis, with the only difference being that Elidinis was involved in the creation of the former two but not involved in creation of the later four. Well, today while I was idly thinking about the Menaphos library (and what kind of heretical documents may be on its shelves), I remembered animalistic colossi like Loarnab, Araxxi, Seiryu, Thallassus, and Valluta were common during the First Age, at least in the theorizing Charos has done.
And I thought, what if Icthlarin was misremembering his own origin? Then I reread the dialog --
Original message details are unavailable.
As I was told, they each took a piece of themselves, a spark of their divine power...
Icthlarin doesn't remember his origin at all. He was told this story about his origin by Tumeken (and maybe Elidinis)
So what I wish to propose is:
Amascut and Icthlarin were already semi-divine colossi worshiped in the Kharidian jungle when Tumeken brought his people into the subcontinent
Humility is self-destruction, pride is the destruction of all else.
And He said, "
Let there be light.
"
And then there were
none
.
22-Dec-2020 08:57:29