- It is not an offensive name but I will discuss it with the Community team.
Derek Booker
- You have already received your answer, it will not be subject to further review.
EagleSunrise
- That thread was gravebumped, clearly. The FMod action was appropriate.
Amdusias
- Name removed and posts quoting it hidden.
zanzoken
- Initial thread was being trolled. FMod action was appropriate and the warning, given the targeted action on thread, is correct. Further FMod actions on other threads are being discussed by the Community Team and we'll post an update later this week.
Alexander
- The post you quoted included naming and shaming. Hence your post was hidden. The FMod action was correct.
Eva Element
- The thread is continuing a thread already locked by a JMod for flaming and personal attacks. The FMod action was correct. Please do not restart the thread.
Mod MattHe |
Former Community Manager, now in Events & occasional Lore Monkey
Kakamile - The issue with these threads is that they unerringly devolve into insults and flame aimed at Forum Moderators. JMods can't designate the time needed to effectively moderate such a thread, and if FMods did it they'd be called out for being unfair/biased.
The thread had run its course by then; nothing further could really be gained by it.
Malua - Ah-hah. Thanks, feedback will be provided.
Aurella - When the first post is hidden, that's the end of the thread. We'd prefer OP to create a new thread with the details after that, so if a different helper came along they'd know everything. Make sense?
Simply Peter - The rule in question states "You cannot show a specific player in a negative light, so no naming and shaming." The thread you've mentioned is not negative.
LtdruneLtd - No. Use the format given on the first post when you want moderation reviewed.
Mod Kalaya |