To be honest, I clicked vote now and was thinking there would be a way to vote no, however, to my surprise there wasn't.
I am not for the wildy due to there is pvp worlds players can go to. My question to you what's the matter, not enough players using pvp worlds, now you want to make all worlds where players attack others in wildy?
I don't want to be attacked in wildy by other players, which puts people at rick when they are trying to complete the quests up there. The revs are good enough challenges.
As far as free trade, well, mixed emotions.
I would appreciate if I could change my vote to NO.
Reply:
Look, the wilderness is a dangerous place, risk is part of the game, the quests up there are suppose to be LIFE THREATENING not all worlds will be filled with player killers (obviously) their are many empty desolate worlds with only a couple people in the wilderness. Revenenants are nothing like real players, they don't even come close, a player can kill you in 2 seconds, a revenant, maybe 20, all worlds deserve to have some risk, the game isn't going to be coated in sugar and have pillow protection all over the place so that you don't lose your things.
The game has risks, you choose to take them, so if you lose the risk it's your own fault, if you don't like it, don't take the risk.
01-Jan-2011 02:15:50
