forums.rs

Forums

Wilderness and Free Trade Vote Thread is locked

Quick find code: 254-255-49-62042278

of 2094
909090o

909090o

Posts: 23 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
People its going through no matter what. Look how many days are left and how much votes we have. I can say that we are going to reach the right amount of votes and maybe more.
Just face it. You people from 2008-2011 simply fail because you dont know what it was like back with free trade and Wilderness. It was a paradise. Sure some bots and real world trade was happening but does that affect you? No it does not. Just face it that you people who have voted no are simply clinging to a pointless idea or some selfish desire like if you died 100 times in wildy. Its your own fault you died not the wildy or free trade but because of you and the person that killed you. I have ended my rant about the people who have voted no because of these reasons. :)

03-Jan-2011 17:20:00

L4NDSH4RK
Dec Member 2020

L4NDSH4RK

Posts: 967 Gold Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Fragget**
*** really is quite fun now, if you would like me to show you the best way to do it. It does not bother me to take a few minutes to show you, if it does not bother you to take a few minutes to learn the new **stem.
It really is quite simple, as I can tell you are intelligent enough to pick up on it quickly. What do you think?

03-Jan-2011 17:20:25

FredUp

FredUp

Posts: 849 Gold Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
*ate TBA your jsut agruging for the sake of it now aint you
a protection prayer runs out eventually and you can only use one at a time
most people who player kill use more than one form of attack
so it does not matter what you wear a hybrid will kill you thats why people make hybrids to player kill as they can get threw any armour and thats why there so deadly

03-Jan-2011 17:20:47

Spocko7
Oct Member 2008

Spocko7

Posts: 825 Gold Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
old accounts voting newly made accounts voting its all semantics so to all who want to argue and split hairs over apples and oranges heed these words free trade and wildy are indeed coming back so the way i see it you have one of two **oices suck it up and adapt or cry and rage quit that is all you may now resume the pointless debate so in closing i will say ty jagex for return of free trade and wildy long live the real pkers not these short attention span addled pre teens who think current pking is real pking aint been no legit pking since death of original wildy and as an added bonus we get to watch all merch clans crash burn and die due to free trade does it get any better :P :P

03-Jan-2011 17:21:20

Bake n Steak

Bake n Steak

Posts: 948 Gold Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Darth. If you saw that the vote was 90% in favor of your way, would you spend the time trying to remember old pas's, and recovering forgotten account's?
yknot
crack muffin
jimbo6986
blame thelag
rune spikez
s---d---k
these are only some of the ranked pkers that my friend's and i had. some of them have been lost some stolen. I could have spent the time recovering these just so i could vote. But the vote was obviously going in my favor so why bother?
Just by showing you one case contrary to your flawed logic it makes it irrelevant because this could represent the sentiment of a lot of people who used to pk.

03-Jan-2011 17:22:16

MacGriogair
Aug Member 2023

MacGriogair

Posts: 1,293 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
@Darth - just before you go...
We've checked your facts multiple times. Nobody is disputing that you found 11/15 accounts to be unranked. To then claim that it is representative of the 908,000 votes however is where we have the problem.
"11/15 voters on the polls are new players too." - Unranked doesn't mean new.
" So only 4/15 (go simple math!) are players who were around for old PKing to occur, if that. I'm guessing a good 3/15 are players who started prior to '07, which I am one of." - Assumption made, no factual evidence to support it.
"Now please, take 90 and multipy (decimal) it by .2 and you get 18. So only 18% of the voters who voted "Yes" are old," - This figure is based on an assumption and has no relevence. It's not credible nor correct.
"You CAN'T do the same to the No's because the No's aren't creating bots that create multiple accounts just to vote" - This statement is laughable making an assumption that people are botting to vote yes. Can you prove this? No of course not.
"So really, it's still a majority for Yes, but how many of the 18% are Pkers who quit after '07? 40%? 80%? If 40, the percent of players who started before '07, and continued to play is only 10.8% That's still a little higher than the Yes. But what about 80% of Pking voters? It's only 3.6%, which is definatly under the No's. But is it really 80%? Probably not. But unless we do a survey, which most would probably lie about knowing its purpose, then we can't know for sure. " - All done using made up numbers... Yey!
You're not correct and your statements aren't fact simply because you declare them so.

03-Jan-2011 17:23:38 - Last edited on 03-Jan-2011 17:24:37 by MacGriogair

Quick find code: 254-255-49-62042278 Back to Top