forums.rs

Forums

Wilderness and Free Trade Vote Thread is locked

Quick find code: 254-255-49-62042278

of 2094
iPhondle

iPhondle

Posts: 368 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
umm, i started playing rs back in classic, when you created a character you selected adventurer, ranger, mage, warrior. so i been around and even back then i had a main character and pk character. in rs2 i had multiple pkers for different lvls. pkers in the 20s 30s 40s 50s etc. so nearly none of my pkers would be ranked, but they all pked before it got f'd up by jagex. i voted from each one of my pker accounts. i feel they all should count ranked or not because they were original pkers, right?

03-Jan-2011 17:10:50

Power0fchaos

Power0fchaos

Posts: 197 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Darth it wouldnt matter what i did with the numbers you have. Your numbers are 100% false. If you want to do it right you have to get a much higher number of people. Say 50,000 or 100,000 for your estimate it be remotly accurate. I'm obviously not dumb enough to take that time to do that. So have fun, that is, if you actually want to have numbers that make sense.
The way I'm saying is also flawed, but the numbers you get will be much more accurate. There is no way to get legit numbers unless you calculate every single vote

03-Jan-2011 17:11:35

MacGriogair
Aug Member 2023

MacGriogair

Posts: 1,293 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Darth it proves nothing. Nothing at all. Zilch.

100% of users in Runescape play Runescape because they love the wild. This is because by my calculations they have all registered at some stage in their lives. This registration allows me to therefore assume they went on to play. 100% of all registered players played for more than 5 hrs. I use this to assume they went in to the wilderness and by multiplying by the integral of a made up number I can now assume that 10% quit due to bad maths.

^ Sounds ridiculous right? So is your maths. You would need to go through at least 60% of the vote before you can credibly claim anything. That's 544k people, you've done 15. I'm giving up on you here.
Gad... What are you, like 13?

03-Jan-2011 17:12:31 - Last edited on 03-Jan-2011 17:13:23 by MacGriogair

OdensNeptune

OdensNeptune

Posts: 154 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Fragget, that's like saying, I created 90000 accounts and started prior to '07, I should count as a 1/10 of the vote right? I'm more important right?
MY equation only counts one of your votes, the main, the ranked one, the one which alludes to more experience.

03-Jan-2011 17:12:50

I am Shiny
Apr Member 2022

I am Shiny

Posts: 406 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Fragget
My opinion on the voting, Is only accounts from the time old wildy was around. Accounts made after it was taken should not be allowed to vote.
However, voting 10 times isnt very fair either... They should really say 1 vote per IP

03-Jan-2011 17:13:03 - Last edited on 03-Jan-2011 17:13:49 by I am Shiny

MacGriogair
Aug Member 2023

MacGriogair

Posts: 1,293 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
@FredUp
You can argue it's flawed Fred, but you cannot prove it. Sure there is an uncertainty in the vote but do you know for a fact that new accounts created in the past week are even allowed to vote? Do they count? Have you tested your theory and proven it to be *he case?
You're arguing that point without any ground evidence.

03-Jan-2011 17:15:08

Quick find code: 254-255-49-62042278 Back to Top