forums.rs

Forums

§ RS Warring League §

Quick find code: 135-136-28-66059198

of 147
Logan

Logan

Posts: 4,120 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
There was a large amount of trying to be sneaky with rules/flaming at the LC vs TB war today. On one side we had a player that was not allowed in the games, and on their side they claimed a faulty rule saying rounds were "best of 1", which stalled us for about 15 minutes and lost all of our auras (LC still fought well but that is a factor). Also, DumpTruck Jr brought a sagaie switch which is not allowed in the wbs style rules (Rule 2 - No weapon/armour switches are allowed.)


On behalf of all this, TB raises a dispute on LC and asks for an immediate re-match for this rank #1 war. Yakamatack!

05-Dec-2015 21:50:42

Try Hard
Oct Member 2020

Try Hard

Posts: 2,275 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
There was a large amount of trying to be sneaky with rules/flaming at the LC vs TB war today. On one side we had a player that was not allowed in the games, and on their side they claimed a faulty rule saying rounds were "best of 1", which stalled us for about 15 minutes and lost all of our auras (LC still fought well but that is a factor). Also, DumpTruck Jr brought a sagaie switch which is not allowed in the wbs style rules (Rule 2 - No weapon/armour switches are allowed.)


On behalf of all this, TB raises a dispute on LC and asks for an immediate re-match for this rank #1 war.

And council member flame 36/38 Boss Pets
Ex-Leader of
Divine Resilience

05-Dec-2015 21:52:12

KB24 PEANUTS
May Member 2010

KB24 PEANUTS

Posts: 1,069 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
There was a large amount of trying to be sneaky with rules/flaming at the LC vs TB war today. On one side we had a player that was not allowed in the games, and on their side they claimed a faulty rule saying rounds were "best of 1", which stalled us for about 15 minutes and lost all of our auras (LC still fought well but that is a factor). Also, DumpTruck Jr brought a sagaie switch which is not allowed in the wbs style rules (Rule 2 - No weapon/armour switches are allowed.)


On behalf of all this, TB raises a dispute on LC and asks for an immediate re-match for this rank #1 war.

As far as the best of 3 rule, we did continue on to 2nd round and we won 2-0. Thanks
= Leader of
Legend Crashers
and
LC Purple Portal War unit
=

05-Dec-2015 21:52:47

EbullientFew

EbullientFew

Posts: 4,236 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
There was a large amount of trying to be sneaky with rules/flaming at the LC vs TB war today. On one side we had a player that was not allowed in the games, and on their side they claimed a faulty rule saying rounds were "best of 1", which stalled us for about 15 minutes and lost all of our auras (LC still fought well but that is a factor). Also, DumpTruck Jr brought a sagaie switch which is not allowed in the wbs style rules (Rule 2 - No weapon/armour switches are allowed.)


On behalf of all this, TB raises a dispute on LC and asks for an immediate re-match for this rank #1 war.

And council member flame

I said you got one ticked and "L". That's not flaming, especially in light of all of the obscene things you and your clan/fc have said and done to me. L(c) won the war 2-0, even despite you having a banned player on your team. We decided to do round 2 as a formality and for fun, after it became clear that JayJayXD was in round one, TB is disqualified. There's no proof of Dumptruck*r using sagiaes round 1, so your disputes are invalid.

Tyforwar Cheap and painless boss kills for comp, best service and prices. Click for more info- We sell all bosses!

05-Dec-2015 21:59:41 - Last edited on 05-Dec-2015 22:01:02 by EbullientFew

Quick find code: 135-136-28-66059198 Back to Top