forums.rs

Forums

Time Consuming

Quick find code: 74-75-226-66285501

of 2
Z om B1 e

Z om B1 e

Posts: 181 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
This game is too time consuming and an unfair advantage for new players. Current players have been tooken advantage of by MTX spending thousands of dollars on this game. That is not economical in real life to in-game.

This game has potential if it is fixed.
Z om B1 e

19-Aug-2023 17:42:45

Dilbert2001
Jun Member 2006

Dilbert2001

Posts: 30,176 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
All MMORPG are "time consuming" and "unfair" for new players because this genre of games feature persistent progression and accumulate a lot of content over a long time. However, if you are talking about RS3, it is actually far less time consuming and fairer for new players than most other 10 year or older MMORPG because new players have accelerated xp on skill progression in RS3. We also have a lot of free or very easy xp with features like Daily Challenges and D&Ds, as well as free xp stars/lamps granted through playing the game.

For instance, a completely fresh start new skill like Necromancy takes only 75 hours from level 1 to 99, and 200 hours from 1 to level 120. It is far, far better progression rate than vast majority of MMORPG.

19-Aug-2023 18:32:11

Tenebri
Jan Member 2015

Tenebri

Posts: 39,167 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Z om B1 e said :

This game has potential if it is fixed.

are you trying to say a already successful game of over 20 years has potential?

thats an odd statement to make. this statement would work 20 years ago, not now.

however rs3 is not really time consuming at all anymore. especially comparing to what it use to be.
200m all RS3 on 7/3/19
1.2Billion overall Slayer xp / Ultimate slayer title

OSRS 2277/2277 Untrim slayer cape
Hail Satan, He loves for who you are.

19-Aug-2023 19:17:05 - Last edited on 19-Aug-2023 19:17:39 by Tenebri

Ladyolake
Jan Member 2008

Ladyolake

Posts: 7,094 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
And not everyone spends thousands of dollars on this game.

Alot of people pay for th keys, membership and rc with in game money by buying
bonds on GE.

Now some pple do spend thousands but i dont think its a high precentage. The richest person is not who has the most. It is who Needs the least.

19-Aug-2023 21:46:51

Z om B1 e

Z om B1 e

Posts: 181 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
If the game doesn't have an economical statue of spending it would be therefore stealing. It would make a game for only rich people and eliminating the free-to-play and play-to-play aspect of the genre FOR ANY GAME.
Z om B1 e

20-Aug-2023 22:02:33 - Last edited on 20-Aug-2023 22:03:21 by Z om B1 e

Z om B1 e

Z om B1 e

Posts: 181 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I think people like you have no understanding of statistics because if you can see this simple thing that you have to be rich in real life to reach a max level in the game putting in 1000's of dollars is ruining what the game used to be and I see those things base upon factual videos. Old School and RuneScape are dying. Old School with RwT problems and RuneScape with MTX problems because it's pay-to-win eliminating play-to-play, free-to-play, and pay-to-play which are all different from pay-to-win.

The understanding was that Andrew probably wanted people to play his game with chances of making money. But now instead of the low population that is using MTX for the thousands of dollars which could be considered wrong because it brings in pay-to-win it is not giving the population of the game room to grow with the chance that every player can enjoy and even playing ground. Making 11,000 dollars off of 100 people which comes out to 1.1 million dollars compared to giving the even advantage by 100000 players limiting the spending to 500$ per person and that's aside from selling merchandise they are making 50$ million dollars and the game is populated and popular because it's fair and the MTX right now is ruining it for the people that need a chance because they are not rich and they have tried making it an E-sport which MTX would eliminate that too.

Having a limit on what you can purchase would make the game better and more safe. Along with Quests boosts like once you completed the quest you get quest item's, Gp and supplies.
But don't be stubborn cook's assistant should give you 10k gp and so forth according to the level of tier of quest. If it's stubborn giving a little and selling gp for money it defeats the purpose of playing the video game which makes it pay-to-pay.

Pay-to-pay and pay-to-win should not ever exist when it comes to the success and enjoyment of others for the video game.
Z om B1 e

27-Aug-2023 02:51:42 - Last edited on 27-Aug-2023 02:54:02 by Z om B1 e

Dilbert2001
Jun Member 2006

Dilbert2001

Posts: 30,176 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Pay to win actually makes RS3 far less time consuming. Without pay to win, players only buy membership won't be able to get free TH keys daily and a lot more from playing the game.

Pay to win actually is great for non-pay to win players who want to play less time consuming games like RS3.

27-Aug-2023 17:18:01

Quick find code: 74-75-226-66285501 Back to Top