Forums
TH Tokens Avalable for Ironmn?
Quick find code: 366-367-783-66214726
If GE is strictly not an option, then why make it possible to trade bonds?
Or why not make TH available for Ironman except restrict them to winning only cosmetic items?
Just a silly idea
But still, if Ironman can do things like the summer event, where they unlock cosmetics AND 'free' xp from things like sandcastles, then why not something purely cosmetic from TH?
By the way, I have 87 Construction almost entirely from sandcastles.
Or why not make TH available for Ironman except restrict them to winning only cosmetic items?
Just a silly idea
But still, if Ironman can do things like the summer event, where they unlock cosmetics AND 'free' xp from things like sandcastles, then why not something purely cosmetic from TH?
By the way, I have 87 Construction almost entirely from sandcastles.
20-May-2021 06:57:19
I support, thinking it would be very reasonable for Jagex to make these cosmetic overrides unlockable in some way to ironmen. It doesn't affect the "ironman experience", but I don't see why they should be left out.
I don't see a problem with ironmen having some viable way of obtaining cosmetics like these.
I don't see a problem with ironmen having some viable way of obtaining cosmetics like these.
Forum Moderator
10-Jun-2021 13:38:26
Theos
said
:
I support, thinking it would be very reasonable for Jagex to make these cosmetic overrides unlockable in some way to ironmen. It doesn't affect the "ironman experience", but I don't see why they should be left out.
I don't see a problem with ironmen having some viable way of obtaining cosmetics like these.
Just because something is cosmetic doesnt mean IM should be allowed to break one of their rules.
I mean whats the point in rules to begin with if ppl are always trying to find ways to subvert them?
Ppl really need to start reading whats their getting themselves into before starting a mode.
I support, thinking it would be very reasonable for Jagex to make these cosmetic overrides unlockable in some way to ironmen. It doesn't affect the "ironman experience", but I don't see why they should be left out.
I don't see a problem with ironmen having some viable way of obtaining cosmetics like these.
Just because something is cosmetic doesnt mean IM should be allowed to break one of their rules.
I mean whats the point in rules to begin with if ppl are always trying to find ways to subvert them?
Ppl really need to start reading whats their getting themselves into before starting a mode.
Draco Burnz
Anime Fanatic
Defender of the logical
18-Jun-2021 02:09:36
Draco Burnz
said
:
Theos said :
I support, thinking it would be very reasonable for Jagex to make these cosmetic overrides unlockable in some way to ironmen. It doesn't affect the "ironman experience", but I don't see why they should be left out.
I don't see a problem with ironmen having some viable way of obtaining cosmetics like these.
Just because something is cosmetic doesnt mean IM should be allowed to break one of their rules.
I mean whats the point in rules to begin with if ppl are always trying to find ways to subvert them?
Ppl really need to start reading whats their getting themselves into before starting a mode.
Ironman mode is the evolved version of self-sustainable/do-it-yourself accounts that were renamed to ironman right around the time Jagex made it an official game mode. As such, the "no trading with other players" is not really what ironman is about, moreso it is about playing the game without the help of other players. You not wanting TH cosmetics to be attainable on a ironman account has nothing to rule integrity but rather you think that it tampers with a nonexistent elite status of ironman. Ironman is a challenge mode to see what you can do on your own, it's not a status symbol and there is no reason to prevent ironman accounts from being able to receive TH tokens in trade as long as it unlocks purely cosmetic items as it doesn't benefit the player in any way.
At the very least, you should be consistent and say that Solomon's general bstore should be disabled for ironman because whatever benefit TH cosmetics give you you can get from SGS.
Theos said :
I support, thinking it would be very reasonable for Jagex to make these cosmetic overrides unlockable in some way to ironmen. It doesn't affect the "ironman experience", but I don't see why they should be left out.
I don't see a problem with ironmen having some viable way of obtaining cosmetics like these.
Just because something is cosmetic doesnt mean IM should be allowed to break one of their rules.
I mean whats the point in rules to begin with if ppl are always trying to find ways to subvert them?
Ppl really need to start reading whats their getting themselves into before starting a mode.
Ironman mode is the evolved version of self-sustainable/do-it-yourself accounts that were renamed to ironman right around the time Jagex made it an official game mode. As such, the "no trading with other players" is not really what ironman is about, moreso it is about playing the game without the help of other players. You not wanting TH cosmetics to be attainable on a ironman account has nothing to rule integrity but rather you think that it tampers with a nonexistent elite status of ironman. Ironman is a challenge mode to see what you can do on your own, it's not a status symbol and there is no reason to prevent ironman accounts from being able to receive TH tokens in trade as long as it unlocks purely cosmetic items as it doesn't benefit the player in any way.
At the very least, you should be consistent and say that Solomon's general bstore should be disabled for ironman because whatever benefit TH cosmetics give you you can get from SGS.
30-Aug-2021 05:31:02
Quick find code: 366-367-783-66214726 Back to Top