What are your opinions on companies and the levels of duty of care they currently have?
For example, there could be a corner shop where an individual regularly goes into it and buys a lot of alcohol. This person usually misuses the substance and it becomes apparent when you see the individual outside. Should shops use a moral compass and just not serve this person?
If someone is drunk on premises then yes they may not get served. However some misuse substances to oblivion off of the premises.
It does not stop just here. For example, many games companies are aware that some of their users play an excessive number of hours, such that it would be a burden to the person's health. They sometimes capitalise on this and create more content that encourages this behaviour, or even use loot boxes (which are currently being scrutinised by authorities across a number of countries right now).
And how about general problem gamblers?
Do you think companies should owe a greater duty of care to their consumers in this day and age? Or do you think individuals should take responsibility for themselves, even if perhaps they have some sort of impairment (or are starting to develop one) that prevents or makes it more difficult for them to take responsibility for their health and life?
21-Feb-2021 20:58:23